MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406422893 · doi:10.1007/s10238-024-01539-1

The association between immunoinflammatory biomarkers NLR, PLR, LMR and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4406422893 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and Experimental Medicine · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMeta-analysisNonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseMedicineInternal medicineHematologyDiseaseFatty liver

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a chronic liver disorder closely linked to metabolic syndrome. Identifying novel, easily measurable biomarkers could significantly enhance the diagnosis and management of NAFLD in clinical settings. Recent studies suggest that immunoinflammatory biomarkers-specifically, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR)-may offer diagnostic value for NAFLD. However, the effectiveness of these biomarkers has not been comprehensively assessed in this patient population. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between these immunoinflammatory biomarkers and NAFLD. As of August 8, 2024, databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were systematically searched to compare NLR, PLR, and LMR levels in NAFLD patients and healthy controls. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated (PROSPERO registry number: CRD42024580812). A total of 20 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Results indicated that NAFLD patients had significantly higher NLR levels (SMD = 0.43; 95% CI 0.28-0.58; p < 0.001) and lower PLR levels (SMD = - 0.29; 95% CI - 0.41 to - 0.17; p < 0.001) compared to controls. However, no significant difference in LMR was observed between NAFLD patients and controls(SMD = 0.08; 95% CI - 0.00 to 0.17; p = 0.051). These findings suggest that NLR and PLR may hold promise as diagnostic markers for NAFLD, while LMR appears to have limited diagnostic utility. Further research is warranted to explore the potential role of these biomarkers in tracking disease progression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it