Maximizing Data and Hardware Reuse for HLS with Early-Stage Symbolic Partitioning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While traditional High-Level Synthesis (HLS) converts “high-level” C-like programs into hardware automatically, producing high-performance designs still requires hardware expertise. Optimizations such as data partitioning can have a large impact on performance since they directly affect data reuse patterns and the ability to reuse hardware. However, optimizing partitioning is a difficult process since minor changes in the parameter choices can lead to totally unpredictable performance. Functional array-based languages have been proposed instead of C-based approaches, as they offer stronger performance guarantees. This article proposes to follow a similar approach and exposes a divide-and-conquer primitive at the algorithmic level to let users partition any arbitrary computation. The compiler is then free to explore different partition shapes to maximize both data and hardware reuse automatically. The main challenge remains that the impact of partitioning is only known much later in the compilation flow. This is due to the hard-to-predict effects of the many optimizations applied during compilation. To solve this problem, the partitioning is expressed using a set of symbolic tunable parameters, introduced early in the compilation pipeline. A symbolic performance model is then used in the last compilation stage to predict performance based on the possible values of the tunable parameters. Using this approach, a design space exploration is conducted on an Intel Arria 10 Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), and competitive performance is achieved on the classical VGG and TinyYolo neural networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".