MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406430566 · doi:10.62441/nano-ntp.vi.4046

A Bootstrapped Volatile Key Management Scheme for Efficient and Secured Data Transmission in WSNs

2024· article· en· W4406430566 on OpenAlexaff
Girija Vani Gurram, Phanindra Reddy Kannari, Nwokoro Emmanuella C.

Bibliographic record

VenueNanotechnology Perceptions · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSecurity in Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKey (lock)Transmission (telecommunications)Scheme (mathematics)Computer scienceKey managementData transmissionComputer networkWireless sensor networkComputer securityTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent era has witnessed several advances in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs), with few resources presents unprecedented challenges for secured data transmission in an ever-unsecured broadcast network. The situation is more challenging when adversaries are equipped with sophisticated resources having direct access to sensor nodes. Nevertheless, there exists several cryptographic techniques used for node authentication, authorization, data confidentiality, integrity, and other security related services. This paper contributes to novel network security strategies to prevent network compromise. The proposed strategies attempt to boost data integrity, reliability and secure data transmissions. The proposal identifies the strategically important nodes (SIN) in implementing network security measures using volatile symmetric-key management scheme (KMS).The scheme involves four phases: The first phase involves strategically important nodes (SIN) designation using Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO). Usually, hackers find it difficult to guess and access the keys that are selected on a random basis. To further increase the key protection, the scheme introduces a limited lifespan master key (LLMK). Secondly, to secure the KMS, this phase utilizes SHA for LLMK distribution, and paired node prediction. Next phase performs secret key generation with a gradient approach and the key sharing is performed using Supersingular Isogeny Diffie-Hellman algorithm. The last phase is responsible for the dynamic S-Box generation using the Blowfish algorithm. The generated S-Box are subsequently shuffled to enhance the cryptographic process offering immunity towards attacks.To evaluate the effectiveness of this approach, the proposed KMS is compared with relevant methods on various performance metrics. The results demonstrate that the proposed scheme achieves notable performance improvements over other methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanotechnology PerceptionsSame topicSecurity in Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207