MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Enhancing Autonomous Vehicle Navigation with Real-Time Object Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks

2024· article· en· W4406433534 on OpenAlexaff
Arnav Kotiyal, Zaid Alsalami, Nandini Shirish Boob, Arti Badhoutiya, T Mounika, Muthuswamy Jayanthi, Prateek Chaturvedi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceObject detectionComputer visionObject (grammar)Pattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autonomous vehicles’ (AVs) capacity to identify and categorise things in real-time is crucial to their development for the sake of efficient and safe navigation. Because of its exceptional capability to learn spatial feature hierarchies automatically, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have become an indispensable tool for object identification in intricate visual recognition problems. This research offers a thorough analysis of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) used for autonomous vehicle object identification in real-time, with an emphasis on improving detection accuracy and speed. We compare the processing speed, detection accuracy, and computational efficiency of several CNN designs, such as YOLO (You Only Look Once), SSD (Single Shot Multibox Detector), and Faster R-CNN. In addition, to address the demanding realtime needs of autonomous driving systems, we suggest CNN design improvements that use hardware acceleration methods like GPU and TPU optimisations. The experimental findings show that our suggested method significantly reduces detection latency while maintaining accuracy, which makes it suitable for use in real-world AV settings. Autonomous vehicle technology advances thanks to this study’s results, which aid in building scalable and reliable object identification algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207