MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406435282 · doi:10.33540/2743

Resisting Resistance: Towards Unravelling the Secrets of Cellular Immunotherapy

2025· dissertation· en· W4406435282 on OpenAlexaff
Esmée J. van Vliet

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicTransgenic Plants and Applications
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistance (ecology)ImmunotherapyBiologyImmunologyEcologyImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The field of immune-oncology, and the development of a wide range of immunotherapy products that stemmed from it, has dramatically transformed the survival chances for many cancer patients. Nonetheless, there is a large share of patients that does not yet benefit from this success, either due to having difficult to target (solid) tumour types, or through the development of resistance during treatment. Due to the complexity of both cancer and the nature of immunotherapy products, there is a great need to develop novel methods that will allow us to study immune-cancer interactions in a simplified, controlled setting. In this thesis work, we have described optimal protocols to derive breast cancer organoid models (Chapter 2), which have further been used to study engineered immune cell product behaviour in the context of immune-organoid co-cultures (Chapter 4), and furthermore for studying processes underlying sensitivity and resistance to these cellular immunotherapy products (Chapter 5). Additionally, we have provided a thorough overview on the contributions of the field of 3D imaging to our understanding of cancer biology and treatment response (Chapter 3). Most excitingly, we have developed several novel tools to study both immunotherapy products and the tumours they target in unprecedented detail. With our imaging method and associated computational analysis platform called BEHAV3D (Chapter 4), we have provided a revolutionary method to study the behaviour of engineered immune cells, revealing that these products contain a mixture of cells with different behaviours, complex interactions, and (serial) killing capacities. With our newly developed method and analysis pipeline to detangle tumour heterogeneity called FUN-CLON (Chapter 5), we were able to explore the extensive landscape of factors influencing response to engineered T cell therapy, revealing several recurring profiles of responding and not responding cell states and characteristics. Together, these tools offer exciting opportunities for both preclinical and clinical applications, with the aim of further guiding cellular immunotherapy product development and improving patient outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTransgenic Plants and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207