Pediatric erythromelalgia from multidisciplinary perspectives: a scoping review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Erythromelalgia is a rare, chronic pain disorder characterized by the triad of intense burning sensation, warmth, and redness, primarily involving the hands and feet, and usually alleviated by cold and worsened by heat. The objective of this scoping review was to: 1) map the existing literature on erythromelalgia in youth, 2) identify knowledge gaps, and 3) inform directions for future research in pediatric erythromelalgia. One hundred and sixty-seven studies reporting 411 cases of childhood-onset erythromelalgia were identified. Variability was found in reporting of clinical symptoms, the clinical presentations and diagnostic criteria used for classification of erythromelagia, the clinical assessments and investigations performed, and the types of interventions and management plans utilised. While factors to aid early recognition and optimize management have been identified, there are also significant gaps for future research to address. Ongoing efforts to develop a multicenter registry of pediatric erythromelalgia cases, with standardized data collection and reporting, will be beneficial to establish consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and management of pediatric erythromelalgia. IMPACT: This scoping review maps the existing literature on pediatric erythromelalgia. Variability was found in reporting of clinical symptoms, the clinical presentations and diagnostic criteria used for classification of erythromelagia, the clinical assessments and investigations performed, and the types of interventions and management plans utilised. The development of an international registry would immensely benefit multidisciplinary experts involved in the care of pediatric erythromelalgia and those with lived experience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".