MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406448759 · doi:10.1080/15298868.2025.2451437

Unattractive, corrupted, and culpable feared self-themes: Expanding our understanding of self-concept in relation to eating pathology

2025· article· en· W4406448759 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSelf and Identity · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsPsychologyRelation (database)Eating disordersSocial psychologyClinical psychologyCognitive psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is growing support for fear of self as a transdiagnostic construct implicated in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and eating disorders. However, few studies have examined how perceived proximity to a feared self may be associated with the relationship between fear of self and eating pathology. A community sample of women (N = 290) completed an online questionnaire battery. Eating pathology was positively associated with the feared unattractive self and, to a lesser extent, with feared corrupted and culpable selves, suggesting the relevance of a range of feared selves in eating pathology. There was a significant interaction between fear of the unattractive self and perceived proximity to this feared self (operationalized as “feeling fat”) in relation to eating pathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.557

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it