10.1016/s1283-0879(22)42393-6
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
The three-model screen
all 1,000 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Stub record: the title is a bare DOI and the abstract is empty; the assigned topic (ureteral procedures) indicates clinical medicine, not metaresearch.
The DOI-like title and missing abstract do not establish that the work concerns research itself.
Title is only a DOI with empty abstract; residual medical topic indicates domain clinical content, not study of research.
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- Time to knit
- Topic
- Ureteral procedures and complications
- Field
- Medicine
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- MedicineCTDGynecology
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no