A Landscape-Clustering Zoning Strategy to Map Multi-Crops in Fragmented Cropland Regions Using Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-1 Imagery with Feature Selection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crop mapping using remote sensing is a reliable and efficient approach to obtaining timely and accurate crop information. Previous studies predominantly focused on large-scale regions characterized by simple cropping structures. However, in complex agricultural regions, such as China’s Huang-Huai-Hai region, the high crop diversity and fragmented cropland in localized areas present significant challenges for accurate crop mapping. To address these challenges, this study introduces a landscape-clustering zoning strategy utilizing multi-temporal Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 imagery. First, crop heterogeneity zones (CHZs) are delineated using landscape metrics that capture crop diversity and cropland fragmentation. Subsequently, four types of features (spectral, phenological, textural and radar features) are combined in various configurations to create different classification schemes. These schemes are then optimized for each CHZ using a random forest classifier. The results demonstrate that the landscape-clustering zoning strategy achieves an overall accuracy of 93.52% and a kappa coefficient of 92.67%, outperforming the no-zoning method by 2.9% and 3.82%, respectively. Furthermore, the crop mapping results from this strategy closely align with agricultural statistics at the county level, with an R2 value of 0.9006. In comparison with other traditional zoning strategies, such as topographic zoning and administrative unit zoning, the proposed strategy proves to be superior. These findings suggest that the landscape-clustering zoning strategy offers a robust reference method for crop mapping in complex agricultural landscapes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".