‘You can’t do that’? The ambiguities of Wet and Messy fetish videos
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the study of transformative works and the study of pornography are both decades old, there has been little analysis of any pornographic text as a transformative work. This article aims to address this through analyzing the Wet and Messy (WAM) fetish video series You Can’t Do That On Set (YCDTOS), a fan-created iteration of the transnationally successful Canadian series You Can’t Do That On Television (YCDTOTV; CTV/Nickelodeon 1979–1990). The article also addresses issues of genre and format with regard to pornography, in that YCDTOS is both a fan-created iteration of an episodic television series and features no explicit sex or nudity but is still positioned as pornography by its producers. The article also addresses the false binary of mimetic/affirmational versus transformative works, and the unclear boundaries between amateur and professional in fetish/WAM production, to illustrate just how messy a concept WAM fetish media can be.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it