MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406481588 · doi:10.1080/15562948.2024.2448105

<i>Desi but Liberal Men</i> : Pakistani Brides Navigating Marriage, Migration and Integration Between Family and State

2025· article· en· W4406481588 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rida Riaz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState (computer science)Gender studiesSociologyPolitical scienceDemographic economicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Existing public and policy debates largely focus on transnational brides and their integration through an individual-centric perspective, often overlooking the critical role of family. Using the lens of social reproduction, this article foregrounds the importance of family while recognizing social and cultural capital in shaping the ways transnational brides navigate their lives in Canada. Drawing on in-depth virtual interviews (n = 15) with Muslim Pakistani transnational brides, this article examines how family dynamics operate both locally and transnationally, influencing their rights and agency not only within the familial sphere but also in the context of economic and social integration into the host society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.812

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Immigrant & Refugee StudiesSame topicIslamic Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207