MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406488230 · doi:10.1002/poc.4679

Machine Learning Enabling the Prediction of Activation Energies of SPAAC

2025· article· en· W4406488230 on OpenAlexaff
Jason D. Josephson, John Paul Pezacki, Masaya Nakajima

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Organic Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicClick Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersChiba University
KeywordsChemistryMachine learningChemical physicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This study leverages machine learning to predict the activation energies of strain‐promoted azide‐alkyne cycloaddition (SPAAC) reactions. Using DFT calculations, 631 sets of bond angles and Mulliken charges from two acyclic alkynes were collected. Multiple machine learning models were trained on these data, achieving high accuracy ( R 2 > 0.95). Both bond angle and charge were crucial for reliable predictions. The models successfully predicted activation energies for SPAAC reactions with unseen cycloalkynes, within certain limitations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physical Organic ChemistrySame topicClick Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207