MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406493065 · doi:10.1136/bmjpo-2025-gosh.96

178 Increasing diagnostic yield from short-read WGS data

2025· article· en· W4406493065 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth Scotchman, Natalie Chandler, Ben Paternoster, Britt Hanson, Graham Rose, Sarah Nesbitt, P. M. Lombard, Gregory Costain, Vann Chau, Katherine B. Howell, Ingrid E. Scheffer, J. Helen Cross, Alissa M. D’Gama, Annapurna Poduri, Dame Lyn Chitty, Amy McTague

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsYield (engineering)Computer scienceMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/ Objectives GeneSTEPS is a multi-centre study examining the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of rapid trio whole genome sequencing (WGS) in epilepsy patients <12 months old. Current analysis strategies show a 48% diagnostic yield. However, bioinformatic filtering strategies face several limitations, such as variants in non-coding regions, calling of mosaic variants and detection and filtering of structural and mitochondrial variants. Here, we describe initial results of deeper interpretation strategies which have increased diagnostic yield.Methods Four strategies have been applied 1) gene agnostic analysis was used to look for potential novel genes, 2) all known pathogenic variants in the ClinVar database were called, 3) de novo non-coding variants within epilepsy genes were investigated, 4) non-coding variants were investigated in cases with a single hit in an autosomal recessive gene.Results Two novel genes have been identified as potential candidate genes; work is being undertaken to investigate these further. A novel DNM1 de novo deep intronic variant near other variants with proven effect on splicing was detected in one patient and a previously published likely pathogenic variant in the UFM1 promoter region was identified that had not been called by the pipeline due to being non-coding.Conclusion Deeper interpretation approaches improve diagnostic yield from short-read WGS. Other approaches we are applying include improving the detection and filtering of structural and mitochondrial variants, detection of mosaic variants and repeat expansions and further analysis of non-coding regions.Grants GeneSTEPS grant & NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.Acknowledgements for Funding or Support The work described here was funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Great Ormond Street Hospital. The authors would like to acknowledge the International Precision Child Health Partnership (IPCHiP).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging→French-language works237,207→