Geochronology and thermal history of the Mount Everest massif
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New in situ apatite U–Pb and mica Rb–Sr and 40 Ar/ 39 Ar geochronology outline a break in geochronology within the Mount Everest massif at an elevation of c . 8000 m. Above the break, most chronometers record dates from the Eocene epoch, whereas below, most dates are from the Middle Miocene epoch. Raman spectroscopy of carbonaceous material and Ti-in-biotite-based thermometry results outline a break in temperatures at the same elevation. From the summit downwards, temperatures increase to a maximum of c . 500°C at c . 8500 m before decreasing to c . 400°C at c . 7900 m. The coinciding breaks in the independent datasets are interpreted to reflect movement along a previously unrecognized structure, here termed the Adrishya thrust that was active c. 18 Ma. The Adrishya thrust may reflect re-equilibration of the evolving orogenic wedge, perhaps further influenced by cooling and strain localization structurally away from the exhuming orogenic core.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".