MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Using Semeru Cloud Compiler to Enhance Cloud-Native Java Application Performance

2024· article· en· W4406499934 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan Liu, Shweta Shinde, Ladan Tahvildari, Mark Stoodley, Vijay Sundaresan, Marius Pirvu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsIBM (Canada)University of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingJavaCompilerOperating systemParallel computingProgramming languageDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Java-based applications rely on just-in-time (JIT) compilation to convert bytecode into machine code at run-time to improve throughput. However, JIT compilation is achieved at the cost of additional CPU cycles and memory. In the context of modern cloud, where applications have limited computing resources due to containerization, JIT compilation may potentially become a pain-point. The Semeru Cloud Compiler (SCC) is a promising solution that offloads JIT compilation to a remote cloud compiler to reduce the local overhead of JIT compilation in containers. In this paper, we outline novel research directions to further leverage the advantages of remote cloud compilation by extending the SCC to achieve two goals: (i) reduce application start-up time and (ii) improve JIT compilation decision making. To reduce application start-up time, the proposed enhancement is to extract unused or unlikely to be used Java class files from container images. The SCC can still provide the extracted class files to the client JVM if any turn out to be needed. Our preliminary experiments show that this approach can potentially reduce container image sizes by up to 22.1% and start-up times by up to 9.2% for certain applications. To reduce JIT compilation overhead, the proposed enhancement is to perform dynamic analysis of the Java application using the additional resources on the server-side. In turn, the remote JIT compilation can make more informed decisions regarding which methods to compile and optimizations to apply. We are also developing a novel visualization tool designed to help JIT compiler developers identify pain points in current JIT compilation heuristics. Specifically, we have measured that up to 18.9% of JIT compilations for certain applications may be sub-optimal due to later method inlining, and we are investigating how the SCC could help to avoid these potentially wasted compile-time computations by using information learned from other JVM clients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207