MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406505443 · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.12.017

International Expert-Based Consensus Definition, Classification Criteria, and Minimum Data Elements for Osteoradionecrosis of the Jaw: An Interdisciplinary Modified Delphi Study

2025· article· en· W4406505443 on OpenAlexafffund
Amy C. Moreno, Erin Watson, Laia Humbert‐Vidan, Douglas E. Peterson, Lisanne V. van Dijk, Teresa Guerrero Urbano, L. Van den Bosch, Andrew Hope, Matthew S. Katz, Frank Hoebers, Ruth Aponte Wesson, James E. Bates, Paolo Bossi, Adeyinka F. Dayo, Mélanie Dore, Eduardo Rodrigues Fregnani, Thomas J. Galloway, Daphna Y. Gelblum, Issa A. Hanna, Christina Henson, Sudarat Kiat‐amnuay, Anke Korfage, Nancy Y. Lee, Carol M. Lewis, Charlotte Duch Lynggaard, Antti Mäkitie, Marco Magalhaes, Yvonne M. Mowery, Carles Muñoz‐Montplet, Jeffrey N. Myers, Ester Orlandi, Jaymit Patel, Jillian Rigert, Deborah Saunders, Jonathan D. Schoenfeld, Uğur Selek, Efsun Somay, Vinita Takiar, Juliette Thariat, Gerda M. Verduijn, Alessandro Villa, Nick West, Max J. H. Witjes, Alex Won, Mark E. Wong, Christopher M. K. L. Yao, Simon Young, Kamal Al‐Eryani, Carly E. A. Barbon, Doke J.M. Buurman, François J. Dieleman, Theresa M. Hofstede, Abdul Ahad Khan, Adegbenga O. Otun, John C. Robinson, Lauren Hum, Jørgen Johansen, Rajesh V. Lalla, Alexander Lin, Vinod Patel, Richard Shaw, Mark S. Chambers, J. Daniel, Mabi Singh, Noam Yarom, Abdallah Mohamed, Katherine A. Hutcheson, Stephen Y. Lai, Clifton D. Fuller

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOral health in cancer treatment
Canadian institutionsNOSM UniversityHealth Sciences NorthUniversity of TorontoPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
FundersNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringNational Cancer InstituteEMD SeronoGenentechRegeneron PharmaceuticalsCVS HealthNational Institutes of HealthKing's College LondonCastle BiosciencesElektaAmgenSiemens HealthineersPfizerModernaUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterCardinal HealthAstellas PharmaSanofiBristol-Myers SquibbSun PharmaCancer Research SocietyU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsOsteoradionecrosisDelphiDisciplineDelphi methodComputer scienceData miningArtificial intelligenceMedicineRadiation therapySociologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.182
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.173
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1820.173
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.009
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*PhysicsSame topicOral health in cancer treatmentFrench-language works237,207