MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406505519 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsae317

Validation of a fingertip home sleep apnea testing system using deep learning AI and a temporal event localization analysis

2025· article· en· W4406505519 on OpenAlexaff
Kewei Chen, Chun-Hsien Tseng, Hsin‐Chien Lee, Wen‐Te Liu, Kun‐Ta Chou, Hau‐Tieng Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolysomnographyMedicineApneaObstructive sleep apneaHypopneaSleep apneaApnea–hypopnea indexSleep (system call)Internal medicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY OBJECTIVES: This paper validates TipTraQ, a compact home sleep apnea testing (HSAT) system. TipTraQ comprises a fingertip-worn device, a mobile application, and a cloud-based deep learning artificial intelligence (AI) system. The device utilizes photoplethysmography (red, infrared, and green channels) and accelerometer sensors to assess sleep apnea by the AI system. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 240 participants suspected of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) at a tertiary medical center for internal validation and 112 participants independently at another center for external validation. All participants underwent simultaneous polysomnography and TipTraQ HSAT. We compared TipTraQ-derived total sleep time (TQ-TST) and TipTraQ-derived Respiratory Events Index (TQ-REI) with expert-determined TST and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), based on AASM standards with the 1B hypopnea rule. Temporal event localization analysis for respiratory event prediction was conducted at both event and hourly levels. RESULTS: In the external validation, the Spearman correlation coefficients for TQ-TST vs. TST and TQ-REI vs. AHI were 0.81 and 0.95, respectively. The root mean square error were 0.53 hours for TQ-TST vs. TST and 7.53 events/h for TQ-REI vs. AHI. For apnea/hypopnea prediction with a 10-second grace period, the true positive, false positive, and false negative rates in temporal event localization analysis were 0.76, 0.24, and 0.23, respectively. The four-way OSA severity classification achieved a Cohen's kappa of 0.7. CONCLUSIONS: TQ-TST and TQ-REI predict TST and AHI with comparable performance to existing devices of the same type, and respiratory event prediction is validated through temporal event localization analysis. CLINICAL TRIALS: Development of TipTraQ Home Sleep Test, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06474351?term=NCT06474351&rank=1, NCT06474351TipTraQ Home Sleep Test Study, SHH, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06633887?term=NCT06633887&rank=1, NCT06633887.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207