MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406516940 · doi:10.34119/bjhrv8n1-199

Lophomoníase em paciente portadora de sequela de tuberculose pulmonar em Ribeirão Preto – relato de caso

2025· article· pt· W4406516940 on OpenAlexaff
Nelson de Araújo Vega, Juliana de Carvalho Britto, Bruna Ferreira Balduino, Bruno Coelho Mendes, Camila Caldeira Ubida, Igor Ricardo Carneiro Firmino, Mickaella Baldão Nechar

Bibliographic record

VenueBrazilian Journal of Health Review · 2025
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicInsects and Parasite Interactions
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSequelaMedicineGynecologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Lophomoniose pulmonar é uma doença causada por um protozoário do gênero Lophomonas sp, a qual, está frequentemente relacionada a condições de higiene precária e a pacientes imunossuprimidos. As manifestações da doença são diversas e inespecíficas, tornando o diagnóstico desafiador. No presente relato de caso, a hemoptise foi o primeiro sinal que deu início à investigação do quadro. Devido às alterações clínicas e aos achados de exames de imagem, a paciente foi submetida à broncoscopia com lavado broncoalveolar, no qual foi detectado a presença do protozoário Lophomonas sp. Objetiva-se portanto, relatar e relacionar o caso clínico com os dados epidemiológicos e sociais, bem como a relevância do diagnóstico precoce. Este relato reforça a importância da análise diagnóstica ampla, considerando as diversas possibilidades etiológicas nos casos de infecção do trato respiratório que não respondem ao tratamento convencional das pneumonias bacterianas e fúngicas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrazilian Journal of Health ReviewSame topicInsects and Parasite InteractionsFrench-language works237,207