CoLo-CAM: Class activation mapping for object co-localization in weakly-labeled unconstrained videos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Leveraging spatiotemporal information in videos is critical for weakly supervised video object localization (WSVOL) tasks. However, state-of-the-art methods only rely on visual and motion cues, while discarding discriminative information, making them susceptible to inaccurate localizations. Recently, discriminative models have been explored for WSVOL tasks using a temporal class activation mapping (CAM) method. Although their results are promising, objects are assumed to have limited movement from frame to frame, leading to degradation in performance for relatively long-term dependencies. This paper proposes a novel CAM method for WSVOL that exploits spatiotemporal information in activation maps during training without constraining an object’s position. Its training relies on Co - Lo calization, hence, the name CoLo-CAM . Given a sequence of frames, localization is jointly learned based on color cues extracted across the corresponding maps, by assuming that an object has similar color in consecutive frames. CAM activations are constrained to respond similarly over pixels with similar colors, achieving co-localization. This improves localization performance because the joint learning creates direct communication among pixels across all image locations and over all frames, allowing for transfer, aggregation, and correction of localizations. Co-localization is integrated into training by minimizing the color term of a conditional random field (CRF) loss over a sequence of frames/CAMs. Extensive experiments 1 on two challenging YouTube-Objects datasets of unconstrained videos show the merits of our CoLo-CAM method, and its robustness to long-term dependencies, leading to new state-of-the-art performance for WSVOL task.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".