Chemical signals and social structures strengthen sexual isolation in Drosophila pseudoobscura
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Species that coexist in hybrid zones sexually isolate through reproductive character displacement, a mechanism that favours divergence between species. In Drosophila, behavioural and physiological traits discourage heterospecific mating between species. Recently, social network analysis revealed flies produce strain-specific and species-specific social structures. A gene, degrees of kevin bacon (dokb) has also been discovered that accounts for differences in social structures between flies. Why differences in social structures exist between drosophilids is currently unknown. Here we show through an experimental evolution study that six generations of selection in experimental sympatry led to the divergence of social structures measured in Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis flies. We found that the frequency of hybrid offspring decreased within a few generations, suggesting social structures are associated with the sexual isolation of species. We also report increased species' differences in the concentration of the cuticular hydrocarbon 5, 9-pentacosadiene after six generations of selection. The mean concentration of this compound converged in female flies of both species and diverged in male flies of both species, suggesting a quantitative link between increased sexual dimorphism and sexual isolation. Our results suggest that chemical signals, together with social structures, increase the sexual isolation between species in hybrid zones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".