MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406526306 · doi:10.1080/07060661.2024.2442474

Transfer of <i>Olivea colebrookeae</i> into the teak-rust genus <i>Neoolivea</i> (Crossopsoraceae), with its first report for Pakistan, based on light and scanning electron microscopy and DNA barcoding techniques

2025· article· en· W4406526306 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Najam-Ul-Sehar Afshan, Malte Ebinghaus, Maria Riaz, Mohammad Aijaz Ahmad, Abdul Rehman Niazi, Abdul Nasir Khalid

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDNA barcodingScanning electron microscopeGenusBiologyRust (programming language)ZoologyBotanyOpticsComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Colebrookea oppositifolia (Lamiaceae) is a valuable traditional therapeutic plant with a wool-like shrubby appearance, present mostly in subtropical regions of some Asian countries. This plant possesses anti-oxidant, anti-fungal and anti-microbial properties. Its leaves are used locally for the treatment of wounds and fracture and its roots are used for epilepsy. During phytopathogenic surveys conducted in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan, the rust fungus Olivea colebrookeae (Raveneliaceae, Pucciniales) was collected on this economically important plant. Based on morpho-anatomical characteristics and molecular phylogenetic analyses, it was determined that Olivea colebrookeae is related to the teak-rust genus Neoolivea, now placed in the Crossopsoraceae, Pucciniales. Thus, this rust fungus on Colebrookea oppositifolia is transferred to Neoolivea as Neoolivea colebrookeae and reported for the first time from Pakistan. Detailed morphology along with scanning electron micrographs are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.294
Threshold uncertainty score0.495

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFrench-language works237,207