Homonegatividad en la Formación Inicial de las Próximas Generaciones Docentes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMEN:En las últimas décadas la sociedad española ha reconocido derechos y espacios a las personas homosexuales, no obstante, la formación inicial de los y las docentes no se ha adaptado a estos cambios.Las universidades deben ofrecer una formación que favorezca el respeto a los derechos y la igualdad de trato independientemente de las características de su alumnado.Esta investigación se interesa por analizar la homonegatividad moderna del alumnado del Grado en Educación Primaria.Participan 525 estudiantes que responden a un cuestionario con preguntas sociodemográficas y a una escala de homonegatividad moderna hacia personas lesbianas y gays.Los resultados mostraron menor homonegatividad en mujeres, en estudiantes no religiosos y en quienes no se identifican como heterosexuales.La discusión y conclusiones abordan la estabilidad de las actitudes con el avance de los cursos del grado y la necesidad de profundizar más en la formación inicial docente sobre diversidad sexual, corporal y de género.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".