MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406565196 · doi:10.1016/j.jspc.2025.100027

Glasma phase of relativistic heavy-ion collisions

2025· article· en· W4406565196 on OpenAlexafffund
M. E. Carrington, Stanisław Mrówczyński

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of subatomic particles and cosmology. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHeavy ionPhysicsPhase (matter)IonNuclear physicsAtomic physicsEnvironmental scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Within the Color Glass Condensate approach to relativistic heavy-ion collisions, a phase of matter from the earliest stage of the collision is a glasma formed by highly populated gluon fields that can be approximately treated as classical. Applying the method of proper time expansion, which is designed to study this earliest stage, analytic formulas of various glasma characteristics are derived. We calculate components of the glasma energy–momentum tensor which include: the energy density, longitudinal and transverse pressure, and the Poynting vector. This vector allows one to obtain the collective flow of the glasma and its angular momentum. The temporal evolution of all these quantities is studied and estimates of their numerical values are given. Using the appropriate Fokker–Planck equation, we also derive glasma transport characteristics, in particular the momentum broadening coefficient q ˆ . Analysing the temporal evolution of q ˆ , we conclude that the short lived glasma phase plays an important role in the observed jet quenching.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of subatomic particles and cosmology.Same topicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions ResearchFrench-language works237,207