MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406572349 · doi:10.14796/jwmm.h536

Observed Interannual Variability and Projected Scenarios of Drought using Drought Indicators

2025· article· en· W4406572349 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nitesh Gupta, Shivani Gond, Jitendra Patel, Padam Jee Omar, Ravi Prakash Tripathi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Management Modeling · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNirma University
KeywordsEvapotranspirationPrecipitationEnvironmental scienceClimatologyMonsoonClimate changeUttar pradeshRepresentative Concentration PathwaysClimate modelGeographyGeologyEcologyBiologyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The observation-based analysis of drought development in the Uttar Pradesh region in India showed that, despite the area being relatively large, agricultural drought exhibits high spatial variability. However, the lack of net radiation data hinders the capacity to provide reliable estimates of evapotranspiration (ET), affecting the assessment of drought occurrence since its propagation across the hydrological system becomes very sensitive to the estimation of ET. The most prominent precipitation deficits occur during the monsoon season (June to October), showing that changes in the large-scale circulation are responsible for the impact of severe drought. El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) modulates the variability of drought with a warm phase favoring drought development with the strongest influence between August and October. The climate change projections under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios suggest the intensification of drought events in the Uttar Pradesh region in the mid-century, with the Chambal River of the Ganges River basin being the most affected area in terms of precipitation and temperature. The projected scenarios correspond to an increase of 1.7°C for mean temperature, and 3.5°C for minimum and maximum temperature in the 2050 horizon, and a decrease of 400 to 800 mm for annual precipitation was projected under both RCPs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Water Management ModelingSame topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207