Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les pathologies de la glande sous-mandibulaire et sublinguale sont principalement liées à des phénomènes obstructifs (lithiases et sténoses canalaires) et plus rarement à des processus néoplasiques. Le développement des techniques endoscopiques (sialendoscopie), de la lithotripsie extracorporelle ainsi que des abords combinés a fait diminuer de manière drastique les indications à la sous-mandibulectomie pour les pathologies obstructives. Actuellement, les indications à une sous-mandibulectomie par cervicotomie comprennent principalement les pathologies néoplasiques et les rares cas d’échec d’une prise en charge plus conservatrice des obstructions lithiasiques. Malgré l’essor des techniques minimalement invasives, tout chirurgien ORL se doit de maîtriser parfaitement les techniques d’approche chirurgicale à ciel ouvert des glandes sous-mandibulaire et sublinguale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.981 | 0.980 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".