MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406573748 · doi:10.1029/2024ja032651

Observations of Localized Horizontal Geomagnetic Field Variations Associated With a Magnetospheric Fast Flow Burst During a Magnetotail Reconnection Event Detected by the THEMIS Spacecraft

2025· article· en· W4406573748 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chigomezyo M. Ngwira, Y. Nishimura, J. M. Weygand, M. J. Engebretson, A. Pulkkinen, P. W. Schuck

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Space Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSpacecraftEarth's magnetic fieldMagnetic reconnectionGeophysicsEvent (particle physics)PhysicsMagnetic fieldAstrophysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract On 20 December 2015, three Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) spacecraft detected a nightside magnetotail reconnection event in the early main phase of a major geomagnetic storm. The spacecraft (P5, P4, and P3) had their footprints located over North America near the Gillam ground magnetometer station in Canada. Multipoint observations, both in space and from the ground, allow for an examination of the spatiotemporal characteristics of the disturbance on the ground and the associated physical drivers in the magnetosphere and ionosphere. This study shows that the horizontal geomagnetic field d/dt localized (on the scale of 100–300 km) feature observed at Gillam ground magnetometer site was caused by an isolated substorm onset near that station driven by a nightside magnetotail reconnection event detected by three THEMIS spacecraft that were located near the central plasma sheet. A close inspection of equivalent ionospheric current and current amplitude maps derived from ground magnetometer measurements using the spherical elementary current system technique indicates that the location of the localization lies roughly between the upward and downward field aligned current system, which is consistent with other earlier studies. This event represents the first reported observation of ground d/dt localization that is directly linked to nightside magnetotail fast flow bursts and reconnection event during the onset phase of a major Geomagnetic disturbance (GMD).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.415
Threshold uncertainty score0.856

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207