MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406586353 · doi:10.17161/sjm.v2i1.23166

Targeting Lin28: Insights into Biology and Advances with AI-Driven Drug Development

2025· article· en· W4406586353 on OpenAlexafffund
Victor M. Matias-Barrios, Ekaterina Manskaia, Artem Cherkasov, Xuesen Dong

Bibliographic record

VenueSerican Journal of Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPhagocytosis and Immune Regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsDrug developmentBiologyLIN28Computational biologyDrugEngineering ethicsCognitive sciencePsychologyEngineeringPharmacologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lin28, a conserved RNA-binding protein, promotes cancer stem cell features, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and treatment resistance. Lin28 regulates mRNA translation, RNA stability, and transcription, which improve tumor plasticity and treatment resistance, in addition to suppressing let-7 microRNA production. Lin28 is an interesting cancer target due to its many functions; however, its structural complexity makes treatment development difficult. Lin28's proven and new non-canonical activities in cancer biology are examined in this work, focusing on cancer stem cell maintenance, metastasis, and treatment resistance. We highlight computational drug discovery advances targeting Lin28 utilizing virtual screening and machine learning. Generative artificial intelligence has made it easier to develop inhibitors for challenging targets like Lin28. This work integrates current knowledge and technology to demonstrate Lin28's therapeutic potential and outline future techniques to overcome RNA-binding protein targeting challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSerican Journal of MedicineSame topicPhagocytosis and Immune RegulationFrench-language works237,207