MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406602269 · doi:10.1016/j.csite.2025.105805

Design of an additively manufactured thermal solution for an axial flux switched reluctance motor

2025· article· en· W4406602269 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCase Studies in Thermal Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWelding Techniques and Residual Stresses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersEesti TeadusagentuurUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsSwitched reluctance motorThermalMaterials scienceControl theory (sociology)Reluctance motorFlux (metallurgy)MechanicsThermodynamicsPhysicsTorqueComputer scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents the design and evaluation of an additively manufactured thermal solution for an axial flux switched reluctance motor, aimed at enhancing its applicability in light unmanned aircraft propulsion. The primary objective is to optimize the motor's power-to-weight ratio by improving its thermal management through innovative heatsink designs. The methodology involves a comprehensive design procedure to dimension a conventional finned heatsink. The performance of the heatsink is experimentally tested under practical conditions using a motorette setup and cooling fans. Key findings indicate that the proposed thermal solution can enable very high current densities for an air-cooled electrical machine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score0.864

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it