Stability of multi-species consortia during microbial metabolic evolution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Explaining multi-genic adaptations is a major objective of evolutionary theory. Metabolic pathways require multiple functional enzymes to generate a phenotype, and their evolution in microbes remains underexplored. In particular, sites polluted with manmade chemicals or “xenobiotics”, like plastic or pesticides, provide evidence for the rapid adaptation of novel metabolic pathways in microbes, which degrade these xenobiotics into utilizable nutrients. Decades of microbiological studies revealed that these pathways often are not consolidated within a single microbial species, but are rather distributed across several different ones, which cooperatively degrade xenobiotics. These species form remarkably stable consortia in the laboratory, but the determinants of this stability have not been hereto addressed. In this study, we show that trade-offs in microbial life history explain stable co-existence in a mathematical model of a three-species consortium, growing on a xenobiotic as the sole source of a limiting nutrient. Stability is predicted to hinge on a specific “ecological matching” between a species’ metabolic role in the novel metabolic pathway and its nutrient utilization strategy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".