The minerals of the kröhnkite supergroup: structural relations and chemical compositions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The minerals of the kröhnkite, talmessite and fairfieldite groups plus dondoellite, general formula X 2 M 2+ (TO 4 ) 2 (H 2 O) 2 where X = Na, Ca; M 2+ = Mg, Fe, Mn, Co, Ni, Zn, Cu; and T = S, P, As; have been consolidated into the IMA-approved kröhnkite supergroup. The cell dimensions and space-group symmetries of the minerals in these three groups and dondoellite are distinct but the structures of these minerals are strongly related as they have topologically identical structural units. Differences in structure between the different groups involve the disposition of adjacent [M 2+ (TO 4 ) 2 (H 2 O) 2 ] chains and the stereochemical details of the hydrogen bonds that link adjacent [M 2+ (TO 4 ) 2 (H 2 O) 2 ] chains. The ions that form the interstitial complex of a mineral and the structural unit must satisfy the principle of correspondence of Lewis acidity–basicity whereby stable structures will form where the Lewis acidity of the structural unit closely matches the Lewis basicity of the interstitial complex. For pentavalent T cations (P 5+ or As 5+ ), the Lewis acidity of Ca 2+ shows the closest match of all cations to the Lewis basicity of the structural unit. For hexavalent T cations (S 6+ ), the Lewis acidity of Na + shows the closest match of all cations to the Lewis basicity of the structural unit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it