Tracking changes in wetlandscape properties of the Lake Winnipeg Watershed using Landsat inundation products (1984–2020)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wetlandscapes—hydrologically connected networks of wetlands—vary over time, causing changes in their provision of hydrological, biogeochemical, and ecological functions to landscapes. Here, we developed a method for mapping wetlands and extracting wetlandscape properties from Landsat-derived inundation data and applied this method to the Lake Winnipeg Watershed (LWW). We first mapped the annual (1984–2020) time series of inundated areas using a fusion of two Landsat-derived inundation products, Global Surface Water Extent (GSWE) and Dynamic Surface Water Extent (DSWE), finding that this fusion reduced omission errors from 17 % for GSWE and 18 % for DSWE to 8 % overall. We then used the inundated area maps to identify the topological structure of the wetlandscape, i.e., networks composed of nodes (representing wetlands) and their links (representing hydrological connectivity among wetlands). The time series of the wetlandscape properties (number, size, and connectivity of wetlands) showed coherence with a concurrent increase in precipitation over the watershed. The LWW is transitioning to a more extensive wetland area consisting of a greater number of larger wetlands with increased connections among them (p < 0.1). With Landsat-derived inundation products widely available globally, we suggest using the method developed here to analyze changes in wetlandscape properties in other regions worldwide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".