MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406610381 · doi:10.1109/lra.2025.3532159

A Non-Linear Model Predictive Task-Space Controller Satisfying Shape Constraints for Tendon-Driven Continuum Robots

2025· article· en· W4406610381 on OpenAlexafffund
Maximilian Hachen, Chengnan Shentu, Sven Lilge, Jessica Burgner-Kahrs

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRobotModel predictive controlControl theory (sociology)Task (project management)Computer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligenceEngineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tendon-driven continuum robots (TDCRs) have the potential to be used in minimally invasive surgery and industrial inspection, where the robot must navigate narrow and confined spaces. We propose a model predictive controller (MPC) to leverage the non-linear kinematics and redundancy of TDCRs for whole-body collision avoidance, with real-time capabilities for hanadling inputs at 30 Hz. Key to our method's effectiveness is the integration of a nominal piecewise constant curvature (PCC) model for efficient computation of feasible trajectories, with a local feedback controller to handle modeling uncertainties and disturbances. Our experiments in simulation show that our MPC outperforms conventional Jacobian-based controller in position tracking, particularly under disturbances and user-defined shape constraints, while also allowing the incorporation of control limits. We further validate our method on a hardware prototype, showcasing its potential for enhancing the safety of teleoperation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.850

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Robotics and Automation LettersSame topicDynamics and Control of Mechanical SystemsFrench-language works237,207