Mecha: A Neural-Symbolic Open-Set Homogeneous Decision Fusion Approach for Zero-Day Malware Similarity Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With increasing numbers of novel malware each year, tools are required for efficient and accurate variant matching under the same family, for the purpose of effective proactive threat detection, retro-hunting, and attack campaign tracking. All of the state-of-the-art Deep Learning (DL) approaches assume that the incoming samples originate from known families and incorrectly identify novel families. Additionally, most of the existing solutions that leverage the Siamese Neural Network architecture either rely on pair-wise comparisons or computationally expensive preprocessing steps that are not scalable to a real-world malware triage volume requirement. We propose a different route, Mecha, a Neural-Symbolic Machine Learning (ML) system for malware variant matching and zero-day family detection. Mecha is comprised of an embedding network trained in two different scenarios for byte string embedding and an open-set approximate nearest neighbour algorithm for variant matching and zero-day detection. Our embedding network uses triplet loss for embedding generation and reinforcement-based Expectation Maximization (EM) learning for full deployment optimization. We conduct multiple in-sample and out-of-sample experiments to demonstrate the model's generalizability toward novel variants and families. We also show that Mecha can detect samples outside the known set of malware samples with an accuracy greater than 0.990.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".