MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406611022 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2025.3530515

GLFRNet: Global-Local Feature Refusion Network for Remote Sensing Image Instance Segmentation

2025· article· en· W4406611022 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersSix Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsImage segmentationComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceFeature (linguistics)Computer visionRemote sensingSegmentationFeature extractionPattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)Geology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Instance segmentation is a significant way for remote sensing image (RSI) interpretation. The large number, sharp variation of sizes, and complex background of objects raise higher demands for instance segmentation models. The synergistic usage of global and local features has drawn great attention due to its superior performance but has not been fully explored in mainstream instance segmentation methods. In this work, a global-local feature refusion network (GLFRNet) with two fusion procedures is proposed to fully utilize coarse-grained and fine-grained features for RSI instance segmentation. In this model, the backbone integrates both convolutional neural network (CNN)-based and VMamba-based branches to extract local and global features, respectively. Three novel models are proposed to leverage the features adaptively, i.e., the cross-dim feature fusion (CDFF) module, the semantic complementary feature fusion (SCFF) module, and the guided feature refusion module (GFRM). The CDFF module is designed to aggregate features flexibly by fusing features from two backbones with different attention modules in the first fusion procedure. The GFRM and SCFF module are proposed in the refusion procedure to generate accurate segmentation results. Inspired by agent attention, the GFRM dynamically assembles detailed features for mask generation by refusing local and global features with the guidance of fusion results from CDFF. The SCFF module complements the significant features by enhancing and integrating global, local, and detailed features, and finally generates masks of instances. Extensive experiments demonstrate that GLFRNet outperforms the second-best model by 1.9, 1.3, and 0.3 in mask average precisions (APs) on NWPU VHR-10, WHU Building, and iSAID datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it