Lexicographic Multi-objective Order Picking Optimization for Robotic Mobile Fulfillment Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In light of advancements in artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, and mechatronics, robots are increasingly integrated into e-commerce warehouses to enable smart order picking solutions and foster intelligent automation. A robot-assisted order picking process revolutionizes the traditional labor-intensive person-to-goods order picking technology, leading to a goods-to-person (G2P) smart warehouse. Within it, robots transport pods to predefined picking stations, where human pickers retrieve the requested goods from these pods to fulfill customer orders. The allocation of pods to robots and the scheduling of picking operations are key optimization issues in G2P order picking systems. Although they play a key role in improving operational efficiency, existing research has paid limited attention to their joint optimization. This study considers a lexicographic multi-objective optimization problem to shorten the order picking cycles under the premise of optimizing the picking efficiency evaluated by makespan. We build a mixed integer program for the newly proposed problem and develop a matheuristic algorithm by integrating a commodity-order model into a metaheuristic algorithm to solve it. Experimental results show that the proposed method can significantly shorten the total order picking cycles while keeping the minimum makespan. It outperforms a recent state-of-the-art algorithm. This work emphasizes the importance of joint optimization within G2P smart warehouses and reveals the high potential of the proposed method to be used in practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".