MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406615471 · doi:10.3390/jrfm18010041

Cybersecurity in Digital Accounting Systems: Challenges and Solutions in the Arab Gulf Region

2025· article· en· W4406615471 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amer Morshed, Laith T. Khrais

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of risk and financial management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccountingPolitical scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The region of the Arab Gulf is marching ahead very fast toward digitalization in ways prompted by initiatives, such as Saudi Vision 2030 and the UAE’s strategy for Smart Government. Thus, both underscore the boundless movement toward the inclusion of advanced technologies into accounting practices, such as Business Intelligence and Enterprise Resource Planning systems. While these technologies enhance efficiency and facilitate informed decision-making, they also render financial data vulnerable to cybersecurity threats, such as phishing, ransomware, and insider attacks. This paper investigates the impact of cybersecurity practices, ethical accountability, regulatory frameworks, and emerging technologies on the adoption of and trust in digital accounting systems in the GCC region. A quantitative research approach was followed, wherein the responses from a randomly selected sample of 324 professionals representing the GCC nations were collected. The empirical analysis was completed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Strong cybersecurity measures, AI-driven threat detection mechanisms, and custom-fit employee training programs facilitate the adoption of and faith in digital accounting information systems considerably. Ethical accountability acts as the partial mediator of those effects, and supportive regulatory frameworks enhance cybersecurity strategy effectiveness. This study examines the development of integrated cybersecurity strategies with respect to technology, ethics, and regulations. It makes several major recommendations, calling for bringing the GCC countries’ regulatory frameworks into line with international standards; encouraging workforce training programs; and utilizing AI-powered technologies for proactive threat detection and management. These findings can arm stakeholders with a holistic pathway toward developing secure, resilient, and future-oriented digital accounting infrastructures across the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of risk and financial managementSame topicBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityFrench-language works237,207