MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Exploring Integrin α5β1 as a Potential Therapeutic Target for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Insights From Comprehensive Multicenter Preclinical Studies

2025· article· en· W4406623983 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah‐Eve Lemay, Mónica S. Montesinos, Yann Grobs, Tetsuro Yokokawa, Tsukasa Shimauchi, Manon Mougin, Charlotte Romanet, Mélanie Sauvaget, Sandra Breuils‐Bonnet, Alice Bourgeois, Charlie Théberge, Andréanne Pelletier, Reem El Kabbout, Sandra Martineau, Keiko Yamamoto, Muzaffar Akram, Adrian S. Ray, Blaise Lippa, Bryan Goodwin, Fu‐Yang Lin, Hua Wang, James J. Dowling, Min Lü, Qiao Qi, T. Andrew McTeague, Terence I. Moy, François Potus, Steeve Provencher, Olivier Boucherat, Sébastien Bonnet

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsMedicinePulmonary hypertensionEx vivoPulmonary arteryIntegrinVascular resistanceDownregulation and upregulationPharmacologyHypoxia (environmental)SildenafilCancer researchCardiologyInternal medicinePathologyIn vivoHemodynamicsReceptorBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by obliterative vascular remodeling of the small pulmonary arteries (PAs) and progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance leading to right ventricular failure. Although several drugs are approved for the treatment of PAH, mortality rates remain high. Accumulating evidence supports a pathological function of integrins in vessel remodeling, which are gaining renewed interest as drug targets. However, their role in PAH remains largely unexplored. METHODS: The expression of the RGD (arginylglycylaspartic acid)-binding integrin α5β1 was assessed in PAs, PA smooth muscle cells, and PA endothelial cells from patients with PAH and controls using NanoString, immunoblotting, and Mesoscale Discovery assays. RNA sequencing was conducted to identify gene networks regulated by α5β1 inhibition in PAH PA smooth muscle cells. The therapeutic efficacy of α5β1 inhibition was evaluated using a novel small molecule inhibitor and selective neutralizing antibodies in Sugen/hypoxia and monocrotaline rat models, with validation by an external contract research organization. Comparisons were made against standard-of-care therapies (ie, macitentan, tadalafil) and sotatercept and efficacy was assessed using echocardiographic, hemodynamic, and histological assessments. Ex vivo studies using human precision-cut lung slices were performed to further assess the effects of α5β1 inhibition on pulmonary vascular remodeling. RESULTS: We found that the arginine-glycine-aspartate RGD-binding integrin α5β1 is upregulated in PA endothelial cells and PA smooth muscle cells from patients with PAH and remodeled PAs from animal models. Blockade of the integrin α5β1 or depletion of the α5 subunit downregulated FOXM1 (forkhead box protein M1)-regulated gene networks, resulting in mitotic defects and inhibition of the pro-proliferative and apoptosis-resistant phenotype of PAH cells. We demonstrated that α5β1 integrin blockade safely attenuates pulmonary vascular remodeling and improves hemodynamics and right ventricular function and matched or exceeded the efficacy of standard of care and sotatercept in multiple preclinical models. Ex vivo studies further validated its potential in reversing advanced remodeling in human precision-cut lung slices. CONCLUSIONS: These findings establish α5β1 integrin as a pivotal driver of PAH pathology and we propose its inhibition as a novel, safe, and effective therapeutic strategy for PAH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.209
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→