MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406625302 · doi:10.29173/cons29558

Permanency of Dominion

2025· article· en· W4406625302 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueConstellations · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDominionPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The governor general of the East India Company, Lord Cornwallis introduced the permanent settlement act in 1793 in Eastern India. This law expanded to South India later on after the 1800s. The law gave superior landholding rights to a group called Zamindars, a diverse group that can be broadly categorized as rural elites. These land holding rights included a plot with tangible boundaries and tax collection power on behalf of the government. This deed operated on the basis of heritable ownership and would be saleable and mortgageable. However, if a Zamindar failed to pay the revenue before sunset of the due date, the government seized the land and sold it to the highest bidder. This act had both short- and long-term socio-political impacts on its operations. This research looks into the origins of the Permanent Settlement Act of 1793 in a more holistic manner. Most research focuses on either intellectual or political motivations behind the introduction of the Act. This research will try to synthesize the factors and consider the ways they both influenced each other. It will also look into its initial operations and reactions towards it. This will also further explain the Act’s origins by understanding what changed in the first place, why and how so.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it