MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406627898 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2024-3409

TICOI: an operational Python package to generate regularized glacier velocity time series

2025· preprint· en· W4406627898 on OpenAlexaffabout
Laurane Charrier, Amaury Dehecq, Lei Guo, Fanny Brun, Romain Millan, Nathan Lioret, Luke Copland, Nathan Maier, Christine F. Dow, Paul Halas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Ottawa
FundersChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsPython (programming language)Series (stratigraphy)GlacierR packageComputer scienceGeologyComputer graphics (images)Computational scienceProgramming languageGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Ice velocity is a crucial observation as it controls glacier mass redistribution and future geometry. While glacier annual velocities are now available in open-source worldwide, sub-annual velocity time series are still highly uncertain and available at heterogeneous temporal resolutions. This hinders our ability to understand flow processes, such as basal sliding or surges, and integration of these observations in numerical models. We introduce an open source and operational Python package called TICOI (Temporal Inversion using Combination of Observations and Interpolation). TICOI fuses multi-temporal and multi-sensor image-pair velocities produced by different processing chains, using the temporal closure principle. In this article, we provide extensive examples of TICOI application on the ITS_LIVE dataset and in-house velocity products. The results are validated using GNSS data collected on three glaciers with different dynamics in Yukon and western Greenland, including a surging glacier. Comparison with GNSS observations demonstrates a reduction in error by up to 50 % in comparison with the raw image-pair velocities and other post-processing methods. This increase in performance comes from the development of methodological strategies to enhance TICOI's robustness to temporal decorrelation and abrupt non-linear changes. TICOI also proves to be able to retrieve monthly velocity when only annual image-pair velocities are available. This package opens the door to the regularization of various datasets, enabling the creation of standardized sub-annual velocity products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→