MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406630226 · doi:10.62754/joe.v3i8.5955

Field Study: In Health Centers and Hospitals, Infection Control and Awareness of Workers in All Specialties

2024· article· en· W4406630226 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ecohumanism · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfection Control in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsInnovation Cluster (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfection controlField (mathematics)MedicineControl (management)Family medicineEnvironmental healthComputer scienceIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This field study worked in hospitals and health centers to activate infection control standards in health facilities, and the importance of applying them to workers in health facilities even after health centers obtained the accreditation certificate for quality standards in health facilities (CPAHI). The questionnaire was created and sent electronically via social media, where 700 social questionnaires were distributed to people aged (23-58 years), men and women in the city Of Riyadh, and responses from 450 people were obtained via Google Drive.it is concluded the rate Of application Of infection control standards is high.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it