Navigating oral medicine and pathology in orthodontic treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Orthodontic treatment intersects with oral medicine and pathology, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach to patient care. This review examines the identification, management, and orthodontic implications of conditions that may predate orthodontic care, arise during treatment, or have a history of recurrence. Key topics include ulcerative lesions such as herpes simplex virus (HSV) and recurrent aphthous stomatitis, benign soft tissue masses like fibromas, frictional keratosis, and traumatic ulcers, as well as intraosseous jaw lesions. The manuscript also explores systemic conditions and hypersensitivity reactions, including allergic contact stomatitis and lichenoid responses to dental materials, along with common reactive gingival pathologies like pyogenic granuloma and peripheral ossifying fibroma. By prioritizing conditions that are frequently encountered in orthodontic settings, this review provides evidence-based guidance to optimize treatment planning, minimize disruptions, and enhance patient outcomes. Additionally, this review highlights the importance of early detection, tailored management strategies, and collaboration with appropriate medical and dental specialists. By integrating oral medicine principles into orthodontic care, orthodontists can address both pre-existing and treatment-related pathologies, ensuring a holistic approach that supports both orthodontic success and overall oral health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".