MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406661054 · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2025.110330

Magnetic field probe-based co-simulation method for irregular volume-type inductively coupled wireless MRI radiofrequency coils

2025· article· en· W4406661054 on OpenAlexaff
Ming Lu, Haoqin Zhu, Xinqiang Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueMagnetic Resonance Imaging · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsManitoba Health
FundersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsVolume (thermodynamics)Inductively coupled plasmaNuclear magnetic resonanceMagnetic fieldField (mathematics)Materials sciencePhysicsPlasmaMathematicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Inductively coupled wireless coils are increasingly used in MRI due to their cost-effectiveness and simplicity, eliminating the need for expensive components like preamplifiers, baluns, coil plugs, and coil ID circuits. Existing tools for predicting component values and electromagnetic (EM) fields are primarily designed for cylindrical volume coils, making them inadequate for irregular volume-type wireless coils. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to introduce and validate a novel magnetic (H-) field probe-based co-simulation method to accurately predict capacitance values and EM fields for irregular volume-type wireless coils, thereby addressing the limitations of current prediction tools. METHODS: The proposed method involves several key steps: modeling the coil in EM simulation software, replacing lumped components with 50-Ω ports, placing well-decoupled double pick-up sniffer probes within the wireless coil, conducting full-wave EM simulations, and exporting the S-parameter matrix to an RF circuit simulation tool for optimization. The RF circuit simulation optimizes component values by maximizing the average magnitude of the root square of Sxys (mean_√Sxy) of double probes and minimizing the normalized standard deviation of √Sxy (normStd_√Sxy). The optimized capacitance values are validated through re-performing EM simulations, and hardware prototypes are fabricated and tested in MRI experiments. RESULTS: The method was validated using bottle-shaped and dome-shaped Litzcage coils designed for 1.5 T MRI. Consistent resonant peaks and magnetic field distributions were observed across different coil designs. The optimized capacitance values obtained from circuit-level simulations were confirmed through EM simulations. Significant SNR enhancements were observed in MRI experiments, with the wireless hand and wrist/head coil showing an overall SNR enhancement of 12.8/3.4-fold in EM simulation and 13.4/3.8-fold in MRI experiments, compared to the body coil alone. CONCLUSIONS: The H-field probe-based co-simulation method provides an efficient and accurate solution for designing and optimizing irregular wireless RF coils in MRI. By integrating EM simulation, H-field probes, and RF circuit optimization, this method reduces the need for extensive full-wave EM simulations and accurately predicts capacitance values and EM fields. The validation using irregular Litzcage coils demonstrated the method's efficacy, contributing to improved imaging quality in MRI applications. This approach offers a valuable tool for coil developers and researchers, facilitating the development of high-quality irregular wireless coils for enhanced MRI performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagnetic Resonance ImagingSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207