MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Machine learning enabled measurements of astrophysical ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) reactions with the SECAR recoil separator

2025· article· en· W4406665432 on OpenAlexaff
P. Tsintari, R. B. Garg, K. Hermansen, Caleb Marshall, F. Montes, G. Perdikakis, H. Schatz, K. Setoodehnia, H. Arora, G.P.A. Berg, Ramesh Bhandari, J. C. Blackmon, C. R. Brune, K. A. Chipps, M. Couder, C. M. Deibel, A. Hood, M. Horana Gamage, R. Jain, C. Maher, Sara Miskovich, J. Pereira, Thomas Ruland, M. S. Smith, M. Smith, I. Sultana, C. Tinson, A. Tsantiri, A. C. C. Villari, Louis K. Wagner, R. G. T. Zegers

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersOak Ridge National LaboratoryNuclear PhysicsUniversity of Notre DameU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of International Science and EngineeringOffice of ScienceJoint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics - Center for the Evolution of the ElementsNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAlgorithmMachine learningMathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The synthesis of heavy elements in supernovae is affected by low-energy <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mrow> <a:mo>(</a:mo> <a:mi>n</a:mi> <a:mo>,</a:mo> <a:mi>p</a:mi> <a:mo>)</a:mo> </a:mrow> </a:math> and <b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <b:mrow> <b:mo>(</b:mo> <b:mi>p</b:mi> <b:mo>,</b:mo> <b:mi>n</b:mi> <b:mo>)</b:mo> </b:mrow> </b:math> reactions on unstable nuclei, yet experimental data on such reaction rates are scarce. The SECAR (SEparator for CApture Reactions) recoil separator at FRIB (Facility for Rare Isotope Beams) was originally designed to measure astrophysical reactions that change the mass of a nucleus significantly. We used a novel approach that integrates machine learning with ion-optical simulations to find an ion-optical solution for the separator that enables the measurement of <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <c:mrow> <c:mo>(</c:mo> <c:mi>p</c:mi> <c:mo>,</c:mo> <c:mi>n</c:mi> <c:mo>)</c:mo> </c:mrow> </c:math> reactions, despite the reaction leaving the mass of the nucleus nearly unchanged. A new measurement of the <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <d:mrow> <d:mmultiscripts> <d:mi>Fe</d:mi> <d:mprescripts/> <d:none/> <d:mn>58</d:mn> </d:mmultiscripts> <d:mo>(</d:mo> <d:mi>p</d:mi> <d:mo>,</d:mo> <d:mi>n</d:mi> <d:mo>)</d:mo> <d:mmultiscripts> <d:mi>Co</d:mi> <d:mprescripts/> <d:none/> <d:mn>58</d:mn> </d:mmultiscripts> </d:mrow> </d:math> reaction in inverse kinematics with a <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <e:mrow> <e:mn>3.66</e:mn> <e:mo>±</e:mo> <e:mn>0.12</e:mn> </e:mrow> </e:math> MeV/nucleon <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <f:mmultiscripts> <f:mi>Fe</f:mi> <f:mprescripts/> <f:none/> <f:mn>58</f:mn> </f:mmultiscripts> </f:math> beam (corresponding to <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <g:mrow> <g:mn>3.69</g:mn> <g:mo>±</g:mo> <g:mn>0.12</g:mn> </g:mrow> </g:math> MeV proton energy in normal kinematics) yielded a cross-section of <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <h:mrow> <h:mn>20.3</h:mn> <h:mo>±</h:mo> <h:mn>6.3</h:mn> </h:mrow> </h:math> mb and served as a proof of principle experiment for the new technique demonstrating its effectiveness in achieving the required performance criteria. This novel approach paves the way for studying astrophysically important <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <i:mrow> <i:mo>(</i:mo> <i:mi>p</i:mi> <i:mo>,</i:mo> <i:mi>n</i:mi> <i:mo>)</i:mo> </i:mrow> </i:math> reactions on unstable nuclei produced at FRIB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ResearchSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207