Systematic Evaluation of a Connected Vehicle-Enabled Freeway Incident Management System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Freeway incidents block road lanes and result in increasing travel time delays. The intense lane changes of upstream vehicles may also lead to capacity drop and more congestion. Connected vehicles (CVs) offer a viable solution to minimize the impact of such incidents via monitoring the status of the incidents and providing real-time driving guidance. This paper evaluates the performance of an existing CV-enabled incident management system, which minimizes travel time by effectively leading CVs to bypass incident spots. This study comprehensively quantifies the effects of system parameters (speed weight and lane-changing inertia), control segment length, and road information-updating intervals. This analysis identifies the optimal settings for the incident management system to minimize vehicle travel time delays. Additionally, this paper evaluates the influence of CV market penetration rates (MPRs), network volume-to-capacity ratios, and incident settings to understand the system benefits under varying connected environments and traffic conditions. The results reveal that with the control of the proposed system, overall travel delays can be reduced by up to 45% and that road congestion caused by incidents can be mitigated quickly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".