MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406671603 · doi:10.5539/gjhs.v17n1p24

Teleconsultations in Primary Healthcare Centres During COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Aftermath

2025· article· en· W4406671603 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Basem Alubaidi, Ruqaya Mohamed AlShamma, S. Abdulla, Jumana Jawad Mubarak, Maryam Sayed Sadeq AlHallay, Omaima Hani AlMahroos, A Saleh, Khatoon Shubbar, Hafizur Rahman

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Journal of Health Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersArabian Gulf UniversityJohns Hopkins University
KeywordsPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Primary carePrimary health careHealth careMedical emergencyNursingMedicineFamily medicineVirologyPolitical scienceDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Teleconsultation (TC), accounting for approximately 25% of medical consultations, is becoming increasingly pivotal in healthcare delivery. Despite its growing importance, current medical training programs often insufficiently address telecommunication skills. This study aims to augment the knowledge and proficiency of primary care physicians in TC through specialized training at Primary Healthcare Centres (PHCs) in Bahrain. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was employed to assess knowledge, practice, and training needs for TC among PHC physicians in Bahrain. Using total population sampling, data was collected via online Google survey questionnaires. The Teleconsultation Practices, Knowledge, and Training Needs Questionnaire (TPKTNQ) ensured reliability and validity, with statistical analysis performed using SPSS. Ethical approval was obtained, ensuring confidentiality and voluntary participation. RESULTS: An analysis of 185 responses from 257 distributed online questionnaires resulted in a 71.9% response rate, with 85.3% female respondents. The survey revealed that 74.9% of physicians had fair to high knowledge of TC, 89.7% practiced it, but 69% lacked formal training. Despite this, 96.7% were willing to receive updated training. Significant associations were found between TC training and practice satisfaction, knowledge levels, and further training needs, highlighting the necessity for comprehensive TC training among PHC physicians in Bahrain. IMPLICATIONS: Addressing the training gaps in TC can substantially enhance the effectiveness of telehealth services, thereby improving healthcare delivery and patient outcomes in Bahrain. Enhanced training programs can elevate care quality, optimize workload management, and increase physicians’ satisfaction, which is crucial for the retention of healthcare professionals. CONCLUSION: A significant deficiency exists in TC training among PHC physicians in Bahrain. The overwhelming willingness of physicians to engage in future training workshops underscores the readiness for adaptating TC practices. It is recommended that comprehensive training programs be implemented to bolster TC services in PHCs, thereby advancing the overall quality of patient care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Journal of Health Science→Same topicTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation→French-language works237,207→