MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406675660 · doi:10.4000/1347d

MADOKORO, Laura. 2024. Sanctuary in Pieces. Two Centuries of Flight, Fugitivity, and Resistance in a North American City

2024· article· en· W4406675660 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adeline Vasquez-Parra

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes canadiennes / Canadian Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographies of human-animal interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistance (ecology)HistoryArchaeologyAncient historyAeronauticsGeographyEngineeringBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’ouvrage Sanctuary in Pieces. Two Centuries of Flight, Fugitivity, and Resistance in a North American City, paru en cette fin d’année 2024, bouleverse nos conceptions de l’accueil et du refuge au Canada, par le double prisme de la « ville-sanctuaire » et du « sanctuaire dans la ville » ici appliqués à Montréal/ Mooniyaang/ Tiohtià:ke. Son auteure, l’historienne Laura Madokoro, renouvelle notre regard sur le sujet à partir des études migratoires et des « refugee studies ». Sa démarche s’insp...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes canadiennes / Canadian StudiesSame topicGeographies of human-animal interactionsFrench-language works237,207