Neuroimaging stratification reveals the striatal vulnerability to stress as a risk for schizophrenia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The striatum, a core brain structure relevant for schizophrenia, exhibits heterogeneous volumetric changes in this illness. Due to this heterogeneity, its role in the risk of developing schizophrenia following exposure to environmental stress remains poorly understood. Using the putamen (a subnucleus of the striatum) as an indicator for convergent genetic risk of schizophrenia, 63 unaffected first-degree relatives of patients (22.08 ± 4.80 years) with schizophrenia (UFR-SZ) were stratified into two groups. Compared with healthy controls (HC; n = 59), voxel-based and brain-wide volumetric changes and their associations with stressful life events (SLE) were tested. These stratified associations were validated using two large population-based cohorts (the ABCD study; n = 1680, 11.92 ± 0.62 years; and UK Biobank, n = 20547, 55.38 ± 7.43 years). Transcriptomic analysis of brain tissues was used to identify the biological processes associated with the brain mediation effects on the SLE-psychosis relationship. The stratified UFR-SZ subgroup with smaller right putamen had a smaller volume in the left caudate when compared to HC; this caudate volume was associated with both a higher level of SLE and more psychotic symptoms. This caudate-SLE association was replicated in two independent large-scale cohorts, when individuals were stratified by both a higher polygenic burden for schizophrenia and smaller right putamen. In UFR-SZ, the caudate cluster mediated the relationship between SLE and more psychotic symptoms. This mediation was associated with the genes enriched in both glutamatergic synapses and response to oxidative stress. The stratified association between the striatum and stress highlights the differential vulnerability to stress, contributing to the complexity of the gene-by-environment etiology of schizophrenia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".