MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406698432 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae190.1175

P1001 Efficacy and safety of an oral tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor VTX958 in moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

2025· article· en· W4406698432 on OpenAlexaff
Silvio Danese, Vipul Jairath, Bruce E. Sands, S Schreiber, Remo Panaccione, Geert D’Haens, Beatriz Lindstrom, Ken Liu, William J. Sandborn, David T. Rubin, Laurent Peyrin‐Biroulet, Séverine Vermeire, Snehal Naik

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCrohn's diseasePlaceboDouble blindInternal medicineGastroenterologyOrally activeAdverse effectRandomized controlled trialTyrosine-kinase inhibitorDiseaseOral administrationAlternative medicinePathologyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitors (TYK2i) are a novel class of therapies for immune-mediated inflammatory disorders, including Crohn’s disease (CD). A phase 2, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessed the efficacy and safety of the oral selective TYK2i VTX958 in CD. Methods Adults (N=109) with moderately-to-severely active CD (CD Activity Index [CDAI] 220-450; Simple Endoscopic Score for CD [SES-CD] ≥6 [≥4 for isolated ileal CD]) and inadequate/loss of response or intolerance to conventional or biologic therapies were randomised 1:1:1 to 12-weeks twice daily treatment with placebo or VTX958 (225mg or 300mg). The primary endpoint was CDAI change from baseline at week 12. Additional secondary endpoints are described in the Table. Changes from baseline in C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FCP) concentrations at week 12 were exploratory endpoints. Results Mean CDAI change from baseline at week 12 was -113.6, -134.1, and -104.3 for VTX958 300mg, 225mg, and placebo, respectively (p>0.05; see Table). Conversely, significantly greater SES-CD reductions from baseline at week 12 were observed for VTX958 300mg (-2.7) and 225mg (-3.5) compared to placebo (2.1; p=0.0005 and p<0.0001, respectively), and significantly greater proportions of patients achieved endoscopic response with VTX958 300mg (32.4%) and 225mg (24.3%) treatment compared to placebo (5.7%; p=0.007 and p=0.026, respectively). Although secondary clinical endpoints alone were not significantly different between VTX958 and placebo (Table), combined endoscopic response and clinical remission and clinical-biomarker response rates were significantly higher for VTX958 300mg compared to placebo (18.9% vs 2.9%, p=0.041, and 43.2% vs 14.3%, p=0.011, respectively). Greater reductions in CRP and FCP concentrations compared to placebo were observed with both VTX958 doses. Most adverse events (AE) were mild-to-moderate and comparable across treatment groups. No serious infections, thromboembolic, major adverse cardiovascular events, or deaths occurred in the VTX958 groups. Overall rates of skin reactions were also similar between treatment groups. Rash and acne occurred at a higher rate in the VTX958 groups compared to placebo, most of which were mild, except for one moderate AE of acne in the VTX958 225mg group. Conclusion Twelve weeks treatment with VTX958 was well-tolerated in patients with CD. Although the primary endpoint of CDAI change from baseline was not met, higher rates for most objective outcomes were observed with VTX958 300mg, including endoscopic response and combined clinical remission and endoscopic response. Additional data are needed to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of VTX958 in CD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207