MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406698980 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae190.0979

P0805 Sigmoidoscopy is sufficient as a surveillance tool in pediatric Ulcerative Colitis; full colonoscopy is not typically needed

2025· article· en· W4406698980 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSigmoidoscopyUlcerative colitisColonoscopyGastroenterologyInternal medicineBowel preparationGeneral surgeryColorectal cancerCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Sigmoidoscopy is a less invasive procedure than full colonoscopy, demands simpler preparation, requires shorter procedure time, and may be conducted with lighter sedation. Despite these advantages and the continuous nature of inflammation in ulcerative colitis (UC), which typically decreases from distal to proximal colon, the FDA recently requests full colonoscopy to assess UC in clinical trials (i.e. 3 colonoscopies in 54 weeks). Data to support this requirement are scarce in children. We, thus, aimed to assess the necessity of full colonoscopy versus limited sigmoidoscopy in pediatric UC. Methods We included two prospectively enrolled cohorts of children (0-18 years) with UC, both with identical data collection relevant to this study: one from a single-center prospective registry, and the other from a prospective validation of the TUMMY-UC, a patient-reported signs and symptoms for pediatric UC. In addition to explicit clinical, disease activity, labs and demographic data, the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) was recorded prospectively for each colonic segment. The first colonoscopy available after the time of diagnosis was included to better mirror the scenario of post-treatment follow-up monitoring, since the diagnostic procedure should always be full colonoscopy. Results A total of 85 patients were included (mean age 14 ± 3.4, 11 [13%] with endoscopic healing, 45 [53%] with mild colitis and 29 [34%] with moderate-severe colitis). The median UCEIS scores decreased progressively from the rectum and sigmoid (2, IQR:0-4) to the more proximal colon (descending 1, IQR:0-3; transverse and ascending 0, IQR:0-2; p < 0.001). Only 3 patients (3.5%) had inflammation in proximal segments without having inflammation in the rectosigmoid region. Another 10 patients (12%) had higher inflammation scores in the proximal colon than in the rectosigmoid (i.e. reverse gradient), though inflammation was still present in the rectosigmoid region. Conclusion In 96.5% of cases, endoscopic healing in the rectosigmoid region reflected endoscopic healing in the entire colon in children with UC. When inflammation was present in the rectosigmoid, in 86% the degree of colitis reflected the maximal endoscopic severity of the entire colon. These findings suggest that sigmoidoscopy may be a suitable routine post-treatment surveillance tool for pediatric UC patients and in the research setting in order to maximize feasibility and ethical considerations of clinical trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it