MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406699039 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae190.1153

P0979 Real-world effectiveness and safety of selective JAK inhibitors in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease: A retrospective, mul-ticenter study

2025· article· en· W4406699039 on OpenAlexaff
B Farkas, Talat Bessissow, Jimmy K. Limdi, Karishma Sethi-Arora, A Kagramanova, O. V. Knyazev, Cristina Bezzio, Alessandro Armuzzi, Giorgos D. Michalopoulos, Elena Chaskova, Edoardo Savarino, Fabiana Castiglione, Antonio Rispo, E Schäfer, S Saibeni, R Filip, Mohamed Attauabi, Fotios S. Fousekis, Péter Bacsúr, T Resál, Anita Bálint, Emese Ivány, Zoltán Szepes, Zsófia Bősze, Anna Fábián, Renáta Bor, Klaudia Farkas, Péter L. Lakatos, Tamás F. Molnár

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUlcerative colitisCrohn's diseaseGastroenterologyInternal medicineRetrospective cohort studyDiseaseInflammatory bowel disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Data on the real-world effectiveness and safety of selective JAK inhibitors (JAKis) in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) are limited. Methods We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study to assess clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic outcomes of selective JAKis in bio-experienced UC and CD patients. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CSFCR) was defined as clinical remission (CR; CDAI<150 in CD, and partial Mayo score ≤2 with a rectal bleeding subscore of 0 in UC) and not receiving local and systemic steroids ≥90 days before the assessment time point. Biochemical remission was defined as a serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level of ≤5 mg/L and a fecal calprotectin (FC) level of ≤150 µg/g. Endoscopic remission was defined as an endoscopic Mayo score of 0 in UC, and a Simple Endoscopic Score-CD of ≤4 points in CD patients. Therapeutic response was only assessed in patients who had the required data available at the specific time point („as observed analysis”). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate predictors of CR at the end of the induction phase (at week 12 in CD, and at week 8 in UC patients). The potential impact of switching from tofacitinib to upadacitinib on therapeutic effectiveness was also assessed. Results 131 UC and 115 CD patients were included with a median follow-up of 7.5 months (Table 1.). Among the CD patients receiving upadacitinib (n=115), 76.2% achieved clinical remission (CR) at week 12. Furthermore, 59.5% of upadacitinib-treated UC patients (n=100) experienced CR at week 8. Corticosteroid-free CR (CSFCR) was achieved by 76.9% of CD patients and 80.6% of UC patients at week 24, while 50.0% and 36.1% experienced endoscopic remission. At week 52, 66.7% of CD and 86.2% of UC patients achieved CSFCR, whereas 54.5% and 52.9% had endoscopic remission. In UC, the effectiveness of upadacitinib was not compromised by prior tofacitinib failure, while upadacitinib-treated CD patients with stricturing and penetrating disease were less likely to achieve CR by the end of the induction phase (p=.04). CRP (p[CD]<.0001; p[UC]<.0001) and FC (p[CD]<.0001; p[UC]=.02) decreased significantly in both patient groups as early as week 2. Among filgotinib-treated UC patients (n=31), 28.6% were in CR at week 12. At week 24 and 52, 59.1% and 60% achieved CSFCR, while 0.0% and 20.0% had endoscopic remission. Both CRP (p=.04) and FC (p=.04) decreased significantly by week 12. The three most common adverse events were hyperlipidaemia, acne and varicella zoster virus infection, all with a frequency of less than 10%. Conclusion Selective JAKis are rapidly effective and safe for treating refractory, moderate-to-severe CD and UC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→